Archives For November 30, 1999

This week will probably be as typical of my training as any, given my pretty unique travel schedule.  Basically I am focusing on getting my TGU to be awesomer than yours-and I’m talking to everyone. So I’m doing TGU’s with lots of different things, because I feel like it forces my body to adapt and be stable under many objects.  Also, I’m not going super heavy on any squatting (little knee thing), but am doing mostly odd object (like a human) or KB front squats.  Then I will do easy deadlifts every so often.  Pressing, balancing, and climbing….Ultimately It will all depend on who and where I’m training.

Yesterday I trained with Franz Snideman, senior RKC in his studio.

Warmup-Forward, backwards, side, and hard rolls.  Some ground movements too.

Workout-TGU sets

  • 16kg, press in each position-1/arm
  • 24kg, bottom up-2/arm (success on both arms, left is getting awesomer)
  • 44kg, 2/arm
  • 110lb with ez curl bar 1/arm (left arm got up then stumbled on way down)

100lb ball shouldering, 3 sets of each side, 100lb clean and press x 2, 100lb snatch x3 (only caught 1)

150lb ball shouldering, just 1 per side (it hurst the ear)

150lb ball clean and press-just one to try

two attempts of picking up the 150 and 100-failed to stand up, but did load the lap with both

50lb reverse get up

4 squats of the 100lb ball and 50lb ball hugged

double KB front squat with

  • double 40kgx2
  • 40kg and 44kg (1 per side)

That was it…here is some video of it. http://youtu.be/CXXoNZ09QUY

80/20

November 14, 2011 — 2 Comments

No, not the “be good 80% of the time and don’t give a shit 20% of the time” 80/20 rule.  The other one: 80% of your gains come from 20% of the stuff you do.

The very awesome carnivorous man behind the turn around of Livestrong.com, Adam Bornstein (@bornfitness) posted something today: “if you change your exercises every single workout, you’re probably limiting what you’re capable of achieving #thehardtruth” I agree with a caveat or two.
Why I agree: working towards goals means improving in certain things, and in order to reach those goals you must practice whatever IT is that you are trying to improve.  Repetition of good practice gets you where you want to be. Indeed this is true in respect to S&C.  Martin Berkham of leangains.com generally has people workout 3x week only doing the big lifts, and recovering fully afterwards; but there is no arguing that his program is solely focused on strength and getting lean and jacked. I have no problem with this if that is the only goal someone has. Berkham’s program (and other similar programs) works really well for those two goals, involves little variance, is easy to follow, and requires relatively little time commitment.  I don’t like two of these, the other two I do like.
Little variance
1. Boring. As. Shit. The counter point is “is progress boring? is getting leaner boring?” and they’re good counters.  I won’t even argue them, except for once you’ve reached a certain leanness, and a certain level of strength, I think getting better at other stuff too is a good idea. I certainly believe so.  I’m not impressed when people add a few lbs to a lift each month-there is a point of diminishing returns of how strong you are relative to athleticism and physical abilities.  So, once you’ve reached some basic strength levels, it’s probably not too important if your back squat, dead lift, or bench improve a few lbs.  AND, once those gains start coming slower and slower, which they will, that’s when people get discouraged, and start doing really dumb stuff because they’ve stalled, and been bored as shit for a while.  My thought is: keep doing the big lifts in the program, but focus on gaining new skills.  I say this because strength maintenance is easier than strength gain.
2. Specific adaptations. You get good at the handful of things you do, maybe even really good, but you suck at everything else.  You can’t dance, you can’t change direction, you basically are an uncoordinated yet fit looking person.
Relatively little time
1. I don’t like the minimal effective dose attitude at all. It annoys me. Why are we encouraging people to move as little as possible? We should be encouraging people to move as much as possible. I’m disinteresting in perpetuating a lazy, pathetic culture that wants easy minimal effort approaches to getting the things they want.
Easy to follow
1. Awesome because as a whole our society is predominately incredibly uneducated in regards to fitness and nutrition and health. These “only do the big lifts” systems cater and are great for the people out there (lots of them) who do not give a shit about learning enough to form any of their own thoughts on health, or to question things being told to them. Please see Adam’s articles debunking myths here, here, and here as a start.
2. People can’t afford personal trainers, or any good coaching.
It works really well
1. Just reiterating that if your only goal is to look jacked, and gain strength, a lean gains-esque program is awesome.
So, rather than just sounding negative, here is what I personally like to do, and I feel works well for utilizing the principles of the 80/20 rule.
Prioritize your individual goals, be it strength, mobility, awesome pecs, whatever, and do as Adam says: repeat them often enough to actually get closer to achieving what you are capable of achieving IN THOSE GOALS. (I think everyone’s priority should be to move better-and I know that is terribly general, and am doing a post about that).  Then, add in the right amount of variance in your workouts to keep things fun and interesting, to not neglect other skills and capabilities, to spend more time moving, that are easy to do, and aren’t just plain stupid.  The right amount of variance will vary from person to person, because too much “stuff” will take away from the goals, but amounts less than that do all the positives I just wrote above.  And just plain stupid stuff involves many things we see in gyms quite frequently-know why you are doing something. My variance stuff involves unilateral work, explosive training, core stuff (i hesitate saying that…), climbing and other MovNat things, playing sports that you enjoy, hiking.
The big guns of S&C.  S=Deadlift, front squat, overhead press, pull-ups (weighted); C=pushups, horizontal row, some rotation, some carrying and some explosive thing. And sprinting (but please do not just start sprinting without working up to it for god’s sake). Do the big guns twice a week, and work hard and heavy for 3 sets, I like triples on the S and volume on the C, and singles on the explosive (not max singles, just explosive singles). Really quick something like:
Mon-Workout A 1. Heavy BB DL 3×3 & 1 arm bench press 3x an easy 5, supersetted. 2.Weighted pull-ups 3×3 and step ups 3×10/leg supersetted. 3. Power cleans 15, 1 rep every 30 seconds. 4. 2×10 alternating med ball wall rugby throws 5. unilateral farmer walks 3xgym floor length/arm
Tuesday-Pushups, horizontal rows, rowing machine, jump rope, and other stuff you find fun. But not much, and not heavy. Go hiking and do fun stuff for example. PLAY.
Wednesday-Workout B 1. heavy BB front squat 3×5 & BB overhead press 3×3, supersetted, 2. Bent over DB row 3×5 and bulgarian split squats DB goblet hold 3×5/leg 3. DB snatch 20 total, alternating arms, 1 rep every 30 seconds. 4. 20 half getups 5. KB or DB unilateral rack walks 3xgym floor length/arm
Thursday-PLAY like but different to Tuesday
Friday-workout A
Sat-Sprint and play
Sun-Watch football and drink beer.
The following week do B on mon and fri, and A on wednesday.
Each workout starts with turkish getups and dynamic stretching drills, and in-between pairings would go ankle mob, wall slides, and the workout would end with quad&hip combo stretch.
The caveat here is if you are lacking basic strength or mobility, and/or are injured-then you should leave the playing around and exploring until you’ve fixed yourself and gained a good strength and mobility base.
So that’s my more than 140 character response to Adam’s tweet.

Barefoot running argument

November 14, 2011 — 5 Comments

The problem I see with what feels like most academics and scientists is they are such slaves to our science and technology that it blinds them to common sense. For example, with no definitive studies “proving” barefooting is better for everyone, a scientist will default to the assumption that the tech we have developed with our shoes/cushioning/orthotics is invariably better than what common sense tells some of us: our body has evolved allowing us to safely run barefoot! Also this reminds me of the nutrition mess which we are in-reductionism.
My thoughts are easy enough: given the time to work to skillful (barefoot) running technique, the impact of running, inherent to both heel striking and mid/forefoot striking, will be better handled/dispersed through the body when compared to a heel strike-which no matter the skill acquired in heel striking, will always transmit the force up the chain often resulting in more stress on knee/hip etc (vs force distributed with lower leg parts when barefooting) The softer the shoe the harder the foot strike as the body searches for input about where it is on earth. Skilled (important to say skilled) bare footing should see less impactful landings, and as such less stress on the body. However, this takes time to (re)learn how to run-and lots of people use the excuse/argument that traditional running is as safe because BEGINNERS have poor barefoot technique and as a result have impact forces, an the resultant injuries, which are as bad as regular running. It’s a skill, like Olympic lifting, you have to get good at it before doing lots of volume or intensity.

And this came out today
http://conditioningresearch.blogspot.com/2011/11/free-your-feet-why-running-shoes-do.html?spref=tw

But really my feelings are best shown in a picture.

20111114-152015.jpg

Jeans and a T

October 3, 2011 — 4 Comments

Anyone else ever think of the parallels between fashion and diet? Celebrities lead the new style/diet, they style/diet is cool for a while then mocked after, you can’t believe you used to dress/eat that way, you personally wish that it was still acceptable to dress/eat that way…

Our little paleo sphere is seeing that right now it seems. For the beginning “chapter” of the paleo diet we saw the low carb fashion reigning supreme. Robb wolf aka paleo baby Jesus can be heard stating low carb repeatedly in his podcasts, at the beginning. The whole community was shotgunning coconut milk and snorting bacon crumbles-because carbs were evil and fat had been unfairly vilified, so let’s get fats their due time in the spotlight by proving how safe they are with enormous quantities of them.

A few years of this mentality and we started to see fashion designers playing with new styles as the demand changed. Active members seemed to have an interest (hard on) for sweet potatoes and other tubers, as the 400g of fat diet wasn’t cutting it for their physical demands anymore. Robb wolf aka slayer of giant elk started saying low carbish paleo diet.

Now we are entering the next little fashion swing, which is always dangerous. For example, remember how jeans used to be obnoxiously baggy, hanging off asses, and generally looking like homeless losers? Well now I can’t buy jeans because every cut is “skinny or slim”. The style swung too far in the other direction. I hope we don’t see this in the paleo sphere, but it feels like what is coming. My favorite blogger Kurt Harris is eating rice crispies-how long until rice crispy bars, (don’t worry, sweetened with coconut syrup…sarcasm) are “paleo”?

Robb wolf aka atlatl master is staying the course-cautiously allowing more and more carbs (rice and corn! Gasp!) into the talk. Right now robb’s aka looking manly in a pelt paleo recommendations seem to me like jeans and a t-classic. This look has been good since Levis came around. I’d like to see most people stop worrying about macro ratios at all and just eat a classic, real food, jeans and t diet.

Also Vnecks are totally acceptable in lieu of a t.

Be Good At Everything

August 29, 2011 — 10 Comments

“You can’t be good at everything.”

Why not?

Ok, I guess you can’t be good at everything. But, I’m gonna talk about “fitness”, and why I hate it when someone everyone says that “you can’t be good at everything.”

Defining fitness briefly, and I actually like the CrossFit definition-(I can hear the eyes rolling and cries of despair).  The aspects (aspects, not skills. Skills are things like running, climbing, throwing, catching…) that make up fitness are strength, power, speed, agility, coordination, endurance, and flexibility (I actually prefer mobility).  The standard thought regarding training is that you have to sacrifice one area for another, and be strong and powerful with no endurance or mobility; be skinny and have great stamina but cannot squat your bodyweight; be a yogi that can’t do anything other than the broken wing eagle pose.  These arguments are of course ridiculous, just typical “this or that” thought.  Realistically you can be good at all those things.

We just gotta have a better view of what “good” is.  Good is not the best. Good is better than average. Good is something you are proud of. Good is good. We have a tendency to compare ourselves to the best(s) in every category. That’s frustrating and can be demoralizing. You can be good at all of those aspects of fitness; you may most likely not be the best at any one aspect-but being better than the vast majority of others in all aspects is pretty damn awesome.  Let’s be honest, most are NOT competing in any events; so the obsession with slightly improving one aspect- be it strength, endurance, etc- by focusing on that aspect and ignoring the other aspects is pretty useless.

Now, if you are competing, or are very focused on one personal goal or set of similar goals, then tailoring your training to support your goals or contest is great. However, the vast majority of us do not compete (running in the rock and roll marathon isn’t competing unless you have a chance at winning, BTW), and those specific and arbitrary goals of focused individuals are also not terribly common. The most common goals are to “be fit”, “not hurt”, “move better” and of course, to “look good naked” (or something along those lines).  You can accomplish those things at once-and you don’t have to follow a nazi esque approach of one method or another.  Getting “fit” is not a “my way or the highway” endeavor. Getting good at all of it is pretty simple: do some strength work, some mobility and agility work, some conditioning, some play, sleep well, eat well, and don’t obsess over arbitrary aspirations to take your back squat from 450lbs to 455lbs, or your 10k from 40 minutes to 39 minutes. Take what is lagging or lacking, emphasize it a bit more than the other aspects, and have fun. Seriously, have fun, enjoy yourself-otherwise it’s just another job.

My general split:

  • Monday: Strength and Power @ gym or with rocks outside
  • Tuesday:rest, or MovNat Conditioning or Basketball or yoga
  • Wednesday: Rest, or conditioning with MovNatting
  • Thursday: Strength and Power @ gym or with rocks outside
  • Friday: Rest. Foam Roll and TV with stretching, or a massage.
  • Saturday and Sunday: 8 hour MovNat workshops and practice. Endurance.
Author’s note:  In MovNat the focus is on the quality of movement, and once you have mastered certain skills you can start to address your personal goals of conditioning through the technical practice of your mastered skills. 

Well, 3 days ago American Ninja Warrior was on TV-and while I’m sure it’s really tough, it also looks really fun.  As luck would have it, I ended up in this gym in Santa Cruz, CF Maxim, and got to play around on some similar stuff.

I started out with different rolling on the ground stuff on the mats, then did TGU’s w/35,44,53,62,70lbs on each arm.  Then did 3 more sets with the 53lb where I would press in each different position of the TGU.  Then I did 5 95lb barbell TGU’s.  Then I started playing around on the camera and worked up to 120lbs on barbell 1 arm snatch, and various climbing fun.  Also did a couple of 445lb deadlifts, and some bottom up press work with the kb’s.

Here is some of the fun stuff

Butt Cheeks

August 19, 2011 — Leave a comment

I saw this magazine, GLUTES, in the store the other day…and it irritated me.

Ladies, your lower body, especially your gluteus, is made to potentially move heavy stuff.  This includes picking heavy stuff up.  It’s comical/a shame that mainstream fitness screws the message up and perpetuates beliefs that girls will bulk up if they lift heavy weights.  I wish more would listen to Rachel Cosgrove.  Magazines like

Oxygen screw up good exercises with poor advice and examples.  The GLUTES special edition of Oxygen has 5 or 6 exercise routines, and in fact includes some good exercises-Bulgarian split squat, wide stance deadliest, front squats, hip thrusts, RDL’s and step ups-BUT, they take those good exercises and turn them into silly exercises by having their models using 3lb pink rubber dumbbells to curl or press! No wonder their models look lean and not actually strong (I mean, where are the glutes even at in the magazine called Glutes?!?).  Girls have misconceptions that men like skinny girls-nope, girls like skinny girls for some reason. Men like healthy curves. Healthy means strong and capable.

So what to do? Find a qualified trainer to help make sure your form is good, and then move some actually heavy weight with the following exercises.

Deadlifts, with varied stances. Squats, with varied stances. Bulgarian Split squats. Hip thrusts. Kettlebell swings. Step Ups. Single leg RDLs.  I like the following setup.

To “warmup”-hip thrusts (bilateral and unilateral) and swings to “activate” dat ass

Do a bilateral and a unilateral lift each workout. example:

  1. Back squat and Bulgarian Split squats
  2. Wide stance deadlift and Step ups
  3. Front squat and Single leg RDL
Use heavy weights, as in if you can do 8 with good form, go heavier. 
Finally-take your ass outside and sprint uphill.

Your jeans will look better.

More muscle confusion…

August 18, 2011 — 3 Comments

Train the core everyday.

Train the core high reps.

Train the core as a mover.

Train the core in order to resist movement.

Now it’s don’t even train the core: http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/08/17/are-crunches-worth-the-effort/

Here is my opinion on core training: it’s just more isolating muscles.  The fitness industry is moving away from triceps kickbacks and lateral delt day and towards multi joint/muscle exercises, which is nice….but the core is getting left behind in the isolation drills. Before I go further, I do think that planks, and anti rotation work, and even some crunches/bicycles etc (gasp!) have a place in every beginner’s/not consistent exerciser’s training regimen. These folks may lack the base of core strength needed to perform complex drills.  I really think that core training is akin to corrective exercise in that it is needed until its not needed any more. (Yeah, I’m a smartsass) Why would I need to plank for 3 minutes? Nope, progress that drill. How many reps of bird dogs do I need to do? Progress that drill. 100 crunches? Progress that drill!

The core is part of your whole body, and is going to be challenged in that system when training multi joint exercises-that’s why I believe once a certain baseline of core strength is reached, it may not be necessary to continue to directly train the core. Here are some of the drills I regularly throw in to my training which aren’t direct core exercises-yet do provide lots of stimulation. Front squats (both barbell and single KB), suitcase deadlifts, bulgarian split squats loaded one side at a time, all types of medicine ball tosses, odd object (stones, logs, sandbags, people) lifting, uneven carrying (my favorite), single dumbbell presses of all types and single arm pulls of all types. This isn’t a full list obviously, but while these aren’t direct core work-they certainly challenge the core.

Now-if you enjoy specifically training the core, I don’t think anyone would ever say that’s a bad idea. This is different than other isolation exercises in that if you really like your chest day, and you do it all the damn time, you end up with asymmetries that can be problematic.  However, if you keep performing core centric exercises, I can’t see any issues coming out of that. So it becomes a personal preference and time issue-you may not need to dedicate extra time to the core if you are already strong and performing intelligent and challenging full body drills.

Here are a couple of ideas on how to progress some common drills and make them more challenging.

Instead of crunches do Turkish Get Ups. A crunch is only the beginning of sitting up and standing-so why would we keep training only partial parts when we’ve reached a certain level of strength?

Instead of static planks, hold a plank and row. But row heavy! Keep those hips level.

Instead of bird dogs, crawl. But crawl for more than 10 yards. Keep your hips level with your shoulders, and to really make it fun, crawl on curbs, and don’t fall off.

MFCEO KPowers

August 17, 2011 — 1 Comment

I think that it’s important to bring attention to the following advertising campaign by KSwiss. It’s amazing. Kenny Powers is the fictional ex pro baseball player from HBO’s Eastbound & Down–which you should have watched by now.

One of my favorite bits from the show is here.

Now, back to the commercials:

Enjoy

You could check out my about me section….but below here are 4 better insights. Also you could read this http://chasingcapacity.com/2011/07/talking-movnat-with-clif-harski/

I really love halloween.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

I sometimes grow funny mustaches for things like the RKC

 

 

 

 

This is how I feel about running for quasi to actually long distances.

 

 

 

 

  I had very cool bumper

stickers for my group fitness classes.